Log in

No account? Create an account
10 August 2007 @ 03:14 pm
Article analyzing Michael Emerson and Terry O’Quinn  
Terry and Michael!
Gay heterosexual, is there a word for that?: hf_UMPH! [not shareable]chickhazard on August 10th, 2007 08:33 pm (UTC)
Ugh! I love them both dearly, so deciding who's more deserving of an Emmy is quite tough.* I don't agree with the first comment at all though - about how O'Quinn's all over the place. But even if it were so, I think it's safe to assume that any zigzagging across the road on Locke's part is all the writers' fault. I mean, we've seen his work in films and on tv, we know what he can do, and there's no way you can chalk any inconsistencies up to his performance. In my opinion, anyway.

Other than that, it was an interesting read. Thank you for the link. :)

*But of course I'm rooting for Terry to get it, because he deserves all teh recognition he can get. And to be honest, from what I've seen he's a bit more versatile than Emerson.

Fork me, I'm done.
~Lirpa~katje0711 on August 13th, 2007 01:56 pm (UTC)
I have to wonder if it's actually Terry who was all over the place or Locke. I mean, you can only work with what you have.